-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 68
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closes #2487 general issue move deprecated arguments and functions to next phase or remove #2500
Closes #2487 general issue move deprecated arguments and functions to next phase or remove #2500
Conversation
…-and-functions-to-next-phase-or-remove
It complains about the link: |
I see, thi
Ah this has been discussed here: #2494 (comment) |
@bundfussr all deprecations went from |
|
||
### Phase 3 (removed) | ||
- `consolidate_metadata(check_keys)` | ||
- Removed at v1.1.1 `compute_egfr(wt)` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Did this one get updated?? I don't see it changed in the list of files. compute_kidney.R
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Or did we miss it in the last release?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In the repo: https://github.com/pharmaverse/admiral/blob/2487-general-issue-move-deprecated-arguments-and-functions-to-next-phase-or-remove/R/compute_kidney.R
There is no wt
argument anymore.
This is the case for a few other arguments down the line of the list in news.md (indicated by me with: Removed at v1.1.1
)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah so we missed these! Thanks for clarifying and be specific in the news section.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Whoa - feels like end of era where we are not constantly deprecating stuff! @rossfarrugia no phase 1 or phase 2 happening...we at least not yet but it will be minimal.
@StefanThoma do you have time to check on admiraldev or ask @sadchla-codes where she is at on finishing. I think the updates were pretty minimal. |
Many thanks @StefanThoma for getting this completed! |
Thank you for your Pull Request! We have developed this task checklist from the Development Process Guide to help with the final steps of the process. Completing the below tasks helps to ensure our reviewers can maximize their time on your code as well as making sure the admiral codebase remains robust and consistent.
Please check off each taskbox as an acknowledgment that you completed the task or check off that it is not relevant to your Pull Request. This checklist is part of the Github Action workflows and the Pull Request will not be merged into the
main
branch until you have checked off each task.styler::style_file()
to style R and Rmd filesinst/cheatsheet/admiral_cheatsheet.pptx
and re-upload a PDF and a PNG version of it to the same folder. (The PNG version can be created by taking a screenshot of the PDF version.)devtools::document()
so all.Rd
files in theman
folder and theNAMESPACE
file in the project root are updated appropriatelyNEWS.md
under the header# admiral (development version)
if the changes pertain to a user-facing function (i.e. it has an@export
tag) or documentation aimed at users (rather than developers). A Developer Notes section is available inNEWS.md
for tracking developer-facing issues.pkgdown::build_site()
and check that all affected examples are displayed correctly and that all new functions occur on the "Reference" page.lintr::lint_package()
R CMD check
locally and address all errors and warnings -devtools::check()